(PC)Baltsas

Evan Baltsas v. Pfieffer, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20251:24-cv-01278California566 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EVAN BALTSAS, Case No. 1:24-cv-01278-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

v. (ECF No. 22) PFIEFFER, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Evan Baltsas (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant D. Nunez for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Defendant D. Nunez answered the complaint on September 22, 2025. (ECF No. 18.) The case has been referred to post-screening ADR and is currently set for a settlement conference on January 7, 2026. (ECF No. 20.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel, filed on October 21, 2025. (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiff requests the Court appoint him a lawyer under “exceptional circumstances,” due to his lack of “federal court law knowledge.” (Id.) Plaintiff alleges that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.