Amir
Keith Thomas v. Amir, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 KEITH THOMAS, No. 1:25-cv-00394-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT
v. JUDGE TO THIS ACTION AMIR, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF
ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A Defendants. COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF 14 (ECF No. 9)
16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983.
19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed May 12, 2025. 20 I.
SCREENING REQUIREMENT
22 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 23 governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The 24 Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally 25 “frivolous or malicious,” that “fail[] to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or that…