Redick

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 WILLIAM REDICK, individually and on Case No. 1:25-cv-00928-JLT-CDB behalf of all others similarly situated,

12

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

Plaintiff,

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

13

FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

v.

PROSECUTE THIS ACTION AND TO

14

COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS

ON TIME CAPITAL LLC,

15

ORDER CONTINUING THE OCTOBER 27,

Defendant. 2025, MANDATORY SCHEDULING 16

CONFERENCE

17

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

EFFECT SERVICE OF THIS ORDER AND

18

TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE

19

FIVE (5)-DAY DEADLINE

20 21 Plaintiff William Redick (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action with the filing of a complaint on 22 July 29, 2025. (Doc. 1). That same day, the Clerk of the Court issued summons for service upon 23 Defendant On Time Capital LLC (“Defendant”), and the Court entered an order setting a 24 mandatory scheduling conference for October 27, 2025. (Docs. 2, 3). The Court’s order directed 25 Plaintiff to “diligently pursue service of summons and complaint” and “promptly file proofs of 26 service.” (Doc. 3 at 1). Regarding…