Redick

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM REDICK, individually and on Case No. 1:25-cv-00928-JLT-CDB behalf of all others similarly situated,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

Plaintiff,

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

v.

PROSECUTE THIS ACTION AND TO

COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS

ON TIME CAPITAL LLC,

ORDER CONTINUING THE OCTOBER 27,

Defendant. 2025, MANDATORY SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

EFFECT SERVICE OF THIS ORDER AND

TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE

FIVE (5)-DAY DEADLINE

20 Plaintiff William Redick (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action with the filing of a complaint on July 29, 2025. (Doc. 1). That same day, the Clerk of the Court issued summons for service upon Defendant On Time Capital LLC (“Defendant”), and the Court entered an order setting a mandatory scheduling conference for October 27, 2025. (Docs. 2, 3). The Court’s order directed Plaintiff to “diligently pursue service of summons and complaint” and “promptly file proofs of service.” (Doc. 3 at 1). Regarding…