Nolan

Tracy Nolan, et al. v. U.S. Bancorp, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20251:25-cv-01168California1,659 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 TRACY NOLAN, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01168-KES-CDB

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS AND

COUNSEL TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

13 v. AS TO WHY DAILY SANCTIONS SHOULD

NOT CONTINUE AND WHY FULL

14 U.S. BANCORP, et al., SANCTION AMOUNT SHOULD NOT BE

IMPOSED AND REPORTED TO STATE BAR

15 Defendants. (Docs. 12, 13) 16

OCTOBER 24, 2025, DEADLINE

17 18 Background 19 Plaintiffs Tracy Nolan and Nolan Enterprises, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) initiated this action with 20 the filing of a complaint on November 25, 2024, in the Kern County Superior Court, case number 21 BCV-24-104080. (Doc. 1). Defendant U.S. Bank National Association (“Defendant”)1 removed 22 the case to this Court on September 10, 2025. Id. On September 17, 2025, Defendant filed the 23 pending motion to dismiss and request for judicial notice in support thereof, making the time for 24 Plaintiffs’ response thereto due on October 1, 2025. (Docs. 8, 9); see Local Rule 230(c). 25 After Plaintiffs failed to timely…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.