Bhavsar
Shauntae Taylor v. Bhavsar, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 SHAUNTAE TAYLOR, Case No. 1:25-cv-01359-BAM (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE
11 v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
12 BHAVSAR, et al., RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA
13 Defendants. PAUPERIS BE DENIED 14 (ECF No. 2) 15 FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 16 17 I. Background 18 Plaintiff Shauntae Taylor (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 19 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on October 14, 2025, 20 together with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) 21 II. Plaintiff Has Accumulated Three “Strikes” Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1916(g). 22 Plaintiff is subject to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), which provides that “[i]n no event shall a 23 prisoner bring a civil action . . . under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior 24 …