Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Swan Engineering, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20252:24-cv-00797California5,681 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY No. 2:24-cv-00797-DJC-SCR

INSURANCE COMPANY,

12

13 Plaintiff,

ORDER

14 v. 15 SWAN ENGINEERING, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 This case is about the duties owed under an indemnity agreement. Plaintiff 19 Philadelphia Insurance Company filed suit alleging Defendants Swan Engineering, 20 Liberty Pipeline Solutions, Brooke Swanson, and Justin Robert Swanson breached 21 their duty to indemnify Philadelphia after Philadelphia settled two lawsuits on their 22 behalf. Plaintiff now moves for summary judgment, or, in the alternative, summary 23 adjudication on its claims against Defendants. (MSJ (ECF No. 30)). For the reasons 24 explained below, the Court grants the Motion in part and denies it in part. 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 PROCEDURAL HISTORY 2 On March 15, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Complaint alleging that Defendants Swan 3 Engineering, Liberty Pipeline Solutions, Brooke Swanson, and Justin Robert Swanson 4 (collectively “Defendants”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.