Leo B. Turner, Jr. v. Yolo Police Department, et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEO B. TURNER, Jr., No. 2:25-cv-01417-TLN-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 YOLO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant 18 to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636. Plaintiff failed to file a first amended complaint 19 and failed to respond to the Court’s Order to Show Cause. The Court now recommends that the 20 action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. 21 I. Background and Procedural History 22 On May 20, 2025, Plaintiff filed his complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. 23 ECF Nos. 1 & 2. Plaintiff’s complaint is unclear but alleges on “_____” date he was unlawfully 24 detained. ECF No. 1 at 4. Plaintiff names as Defendants the Yolo Police Department and the 25 District Attorney. Id. at 2. Plaintiff also asserts “cruel and unusual punishment against a disabled 26 …