Leo B. Turner, Jr. v. Yolo Police Department, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEO B. TURNER, Jr., No. 2:25-cv-01417-TLN-SCR Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS YOLO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636. Plaintiff failed to file a first amended complaint and failed to respond to the Court’s Order to Show Cause. The Court now recommends that the action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. I. Background and Procedural History On May 20, 2025, Plaintiff filed his complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1 & 2. Plaintiff’s complaint is unclear but alleges on “_____” date he was unlawfully detained. ECF No. 1 at 4. Plaintiff names as Defendants the Yolo Police Department and the District Attorney. Id. at 2. Plaintiff also asserts “cruel and unusual punishment against a disabled 26 …