Rios

Alonzo Warren, Jr. v. Deputy D. Rios, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20252:25-cv-02242California1,708 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALONZO WARREN, JR., No. 2:25-cv-2242 CSK P 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 DEPUTY D. RIOS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee, proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis with an action filed 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed September 30, 2025, plaintiff’s complaint was 19 dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff has now filed a first amended 20 complaint. 21 I. PLAINTIFF’S ALLEGATIONS 22 In his first amended complaint, plaintiff alleges the following. On or about June 2, 2025, 23 while plaintiff was housed in the west facility of the Stanislaus County Public Safety Center, 24 defendants D. Rios, J. Perez, Ruiz, #624, A. Guttierrez, and H. Delgadillo, all Stanislaus County 25 Sheriff’s Deputies, used excessive force against plaintiff in violation of his Fourteenth 26 Amendment rights. (ECF No. 8.) Following officers’ searches of other cells, plaintiff was asked 27 to exit his cell. (Id. at 5.) Plaintiff exited,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.