Rodriguez
Cornell E. Davis v. Rodriguez, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CORNELL E. DAVIS, 1:25-cv-00368-JLT-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
13 v.
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
14 RODRIGUEZ, et al., FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT LODGED
ON OCTOBER 20, 2025 AS SECOND
15 Defendants. AMENDED COMPLAINT
16 17 Plaintiff Cornell E. Davis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On September 26, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and granted him leave to 20 file a first amended complaint within thirty days after service. (ECF No. 12.) The screening 21 order was served on Plaintiff by mail on the same date. (See docket.) 22 On October 6, 2025, Plaintiff filed a notice of his updated address. (ECF No. 13.) On the 23 following day, October 7, 2025, the Court’s screening order was re-served on Plaintiff at his 24 updated address. (See docket.) 25 On October 9, 2025, Plaintiff…