Elisarravaz

Abel Antonio Elisarravaz v. Carey Haydon et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20251:25-cv-00930California2,312 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 ABEL ANTONIO ELISARRAVAZ, Case No. 1:25-cv-00930-JLT-BAM Plaintiffs, FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS TO

REMAND THIS ACTION BACK TO

v. STATE COURT FOR LACK OF SUBJECT

MATTER JURISDICTION

CAREY HAYDON et al.,

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

Defendants.

18 19 On July 29, 2025, Plaintiff Abel Antonio Elisarravaz (“Plaintiff”) removed this action from Madera County Superior Court. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and paid the filing fee. Plaintiff brings claims against Carey Haydon, Gloria Elisarravaz, Judge Valdovinos, and Madera County Child Support. (Id.) Pursuant to the Court’s independent obligation to address sua sponte whether the Court has subject matter jurisdiction, Dittman v. California, 191 F.3d 1020, 1025 (9th Cir. 1999), the Court reviewed the complaint. On August 18, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be remanded back to state court for 27 1 Elisarraraz v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.