Michael Alan Goldberg v. Warden, Federal Bureau of Prisons

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20251:25-cv-01049California664 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL ALAN GOLDBERG, No. 1:25-cv-01049-SKO (HC) Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR STAY

AND EXTENSION OF TIME IN LIGHT OF

v. LAPSE IN APPROPRIATIONS WARDEN, FEDERAL BUREAU OF [Doc. 7]

PRISONS,

15 Respondent.

17 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He filed the petition in this Court on August 20, 2025. (Doc. 1.) On August 22, 2025, the Court issued an order directing Respondent to file a response to the petition. (Doc. 4.) On October 22, 2025, Respondent filed a motion for stay and extension of time to file a response. DISCUSSION The court has inherent authority to manage the cases before it. Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936) (“[T]he power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.