Earl
Thomas B. Van Horn v. Tamera Earl, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS B. VAN HORN, No. 1:25-cv-01213-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE
13 v. TO THIS ACTION 14 TAMERA EARL, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF
15 Defendants. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS 16 (ECF No. 8) 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 On October 3, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, and found that Plaintiff 21 stated a cognizable claim for deliberate indifference against Defendants nurse Tamera Earl and 22 Dr. Sergio Rodrigues. (ECF No. 7.) The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended 23 complaint or notify the Court of his intent to proceed only on the deliberate indifference claim. 24 (Id.) On October 20, 2025, Plaintiff filed a notice of intent to proceed on the claim found to be 25 cognizable. …