Jimenez

Flor Jimenez v. Hyatt Corporation, a Delaware Corporation; and Does 1 to 10

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20252:23-cv-03028California1,479 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FLOR JIMENEZ, No. 2:23-cv-03028-TLN-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER HYATT CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1 to 10, 15 Defendants.

17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Flor Jimenez’s Ex Parte Application for an 18 Order Clarifying Expert Disclosure Deadlines or, Alternatively, Extending Expert Disclosure 19 Deadlines in Accordance with the Court’s Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order. (ECF No. 78.) 20 Defendant Hyatt Corporation filed an opposition. (ECF No. 79.) For the reasons set forth below, 21 Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application is GRANTED. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On December 28, 2023, Plaintiff filed her Complaint alleging claims for: (1) violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and (2) violations of the Unruh Civil Rights Act. (ECF No. 1.) On March 7, 2024, the Court entered an Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order. (ECF No. 8.) On April 30, 2024, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.