CDCR

Benjamin Robert Gallegos v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20252:24-cv-01595California4,832 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BENJAMIN ROBERT GALLEGOS, No. 2:24-cv-1595 DJC AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is a state inmate who filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 without a lawyer. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”). ECF No. 12. For the reasons discussed below, the court will recommend that the FAC be dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim. I. Background A. Original Complaint The original complaint alleged that defendants California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), Leech, Boxall and Prudhel violated plaintiff’s rights when they held an 26 Although the document is titled “Addendum,” it appears to be a FAC filed in response to the court’s September 3, 2025, order directing plaintiff to file an amended complaint or risk…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.