Timothy D. Wilkins v. D. Smith, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20252:24-cv-03135California1,448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIMOTHY D. WILKINS, No. 2:24-cv-03135-DJC-CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER

D. SMITH, et al.,

15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to the Eastern District of California’s Local Rule 302. On July 8, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations, which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that Plaintiff could file objections within the time stated therein. (ECF No. 21.) Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendations. (ECF No. 22.) In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 304(f), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the majority of the findings and recommendations supported by the record and proper analysis. Accordingly, the Court will adopt the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.