USCIS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AVTAR SINGH, No. 2:25-cv-01867 DAD AC PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 Plaintiff, appearing in pro se, filed a complaint and paid the filing fee on July 2, 2025. 19 ECF No. 1. That same day, a scheduling order was issued directing the plaintiff to 20 serve a copy of the scheduling order and complete service of process within 90 days of filing the 21 complaint. ECF No. 3 at 2. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to complete service within 90 22 days may result in dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 40(m). Id. The deadline passed, and 23 no certificate of service was filed. On October 6, 2025, the court issued an Order to Show Cause 24 why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, noting that the filing of proof of 25 service within 14 days would discharge the order. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff did not respond or file a 26 proof of service. …