Cates

Roderick Lynn Wade v. B. Gates, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20251:22-cv-00123California6,218 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODERICK LYNN WADE, No. 1:22-cv-00123-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

v. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS B. GATES, et al., (ECF Nos. 25, 27)

Defendants.

16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. I. BACKGROUND On June 13, 2025, Plaintiff’s complaint was screened. (ECF No. 21.) The screening order found that the complaint only stated claims against Defendants Nege and Montegrande for Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference. Id. at 21. As a result, Plaintiff was given the options of moving forward with the complaint as screened; of filing an amended complaint; of filing a notice of his intent to stand on the complaint, or of voluntarily dismissing this matter in its entirety. Id. at 21-22. Plaintiff was given thirty days to take one of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.