Holmes

Gary Ronnell Perkins v. Judith Holmes, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20251:23-cv-01607California3,244 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GARY RONNELL PERKINS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01607-JLT-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, SCHEDULING ORDER

Exhaustion Motions: January 23, 2026 v. Motions to Compel: May 22, 2026

JUDITH HOLMES, et al., Non-expert Discovery: June 24, 2026

13 Defendant(s). Dispositive Motions: July 24, 2026

15 This Court now sets a schedule for this action through the filing of dispositive motions. I. DISCOVERY PROCEDURES Discovery is now open, and the parties are granted leave to serve discovery requests. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1, 16, and 26–36, discovery shall proceed as follows: 1. The parties may take the following types of discovery from other parties: a. Interrogatories (an interrogatory is a written question or request for information and “may relate to any matter that may be inquired into under Rule 26(b).” Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(a)(2)); 24 b. Requests for Production (a request for production is a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.