Holmes

Gary Ronnell Perkins v. Judith Holmes, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20251:23-cv-01607California3,244 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GARY RONNELL PERKINS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01607-JLT-EPG (PC) 8 Plaintiff, SCHEDULING ORDER

9 Exhaustion Motions: January 23, 2026 10 v. Motions to Compel: May 22, 2026 11

12 JUDITH HOLMES, et al., Non-expert Discovery: June 24, 2026

13 Defendant(s). Dispositive Motions: July 24, 2026 14

15 16 This Court now sets a schedule for this action through the filing of dispositive motions. 17 I. DISCOVERY PROCEDURES 18 Discovery is now open, and the parties are granted leave to serve discovery requests. 19 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1, 16, and 26–36, discovery shall proceed as 20 follows: 21 1. The parties may take the following types of discovery from other parties: 22 a. Interrogatories (an interrogatory is a written question or request for 23 information and “may relate to any matter that may be inquired into under Rule 26(b).” Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(a)(2)); 24 b. Requests for Production (a request for production is a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.