Cordova

Zenaida Cordova v. Officer Greg Rodriguez, Acting Warden Michael Pallares

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20251:24-cv-00482California315 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ZENAIDA CORDOVA, Case No. 1:24-cv-00482 JLT HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECCOMENDATION IN FULL

13 v.

14 OFFICER GREG RODRIGUEZ, ACTING WARDEN MICHAEL (Docs. 16, 35) 15 PALLARES, 16 Defendants. 17 18 On September 29, 2025, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued Findings and 19 Recommendations granting Defendant Pallares’ motion to dismiss, but allowing Plaintiff leave to 20 amend her Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant Pallares. (Doc. 35 at 1.) The Court 21 served the Findings and Recommendations on the parties and notified them that any objections 22 were to be filed within 14 days. (Id. at 12.) The Court also warned the parties that failure to 23 timely file objections “may result in the waiver of certain rights on appeal.” (Id. (citing 24 Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014).) No party has filed objections and the 25 time to do so has passed. (See docket.) 26 According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.