Hector Martin Prieto v. John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HECTOR MARTIN PRIETO, Case No. 1:25-cv-00650-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 13 v. 14 JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2, NOVEMBER 14, 2025 DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Hector Prieto, a state prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights 18 complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on May 30, 2025. (Doc. No. 1). On June 27, 2025, the 19 undersigned screened Plaintiff’s Complaint and found it failed to state a claim. (Doc. No. 9). 20 Plaintiff timely filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”). (Doc. No. 10). On July 23, 2025, the 21 undersigned screened the FAC and found it stated cognizable Eighth Amendment excessive use 22 of force claim against John Doe 1 and John Doe 2 but failed to state any other claims. (Doc. No. 23 11 at 1). On August 14, 2025, Plaintiff filed a notice stating that he voluntarily dismisses certain 24 defendants and claims the Court deemed non-cognizable. (Doc. No. 12, “Notice”). All claims 25 deemed non-cognizable were…