Enriquez
Jose Antonio Martinez v. Ruby Enriquez, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE ANTONIO MARTINEZ, No. 1:25-cv-00854-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE
v. TO THIS ACTION RUBY ENRIQUEZ, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF
Defendants. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS (ECF No. 16) 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983.
20 On October 3, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, and found 21 that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim for sexual harassment in violation of the Eighth 22 Amendment against Defendant Ruby Enriquez. (ECF No. 15.) The Court granted Plaintiff leave 23 to file an amended complaint or notify the Court of his intent to proceed only on the deliberate 24 indifference claim. (Id.) On October 23, 2025, Plaintiff filed a notice of intent to proceed on the 25 claim found to be cognizable. …