Windsor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE D. LOCKWOOD, No. 2:24-cv-02761 SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

HARRY WINDSOR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is incarcerated in state prison and proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint is before the undersigned for screening. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The complaint, which names current and former heads of state and other public figures as defendants, is incoherent and should be dismissed without leave to amend. Because the complaint is frivolous, the undersigned will also recommend that plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. See Tripati v. First Nat. Bank & Tr., 821 F.2d 1368, 1370 (9th Cir. 1987) (“A district court may deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis at the outset if it appears from the face of the proposed complaint that the action is frivolous or without merit.”). STATUTORY SCREENING 26…