Macomber

Larry Sermeno v. Jeff Macomber, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20252:25-cv-02377California1,575 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARRY SERMENO, No. 2:25-CV-02377-TLN-DMC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 JEFF MACOMBER, et al., And 15 Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the 18 Court is Plaintiff’s original complaint, ECF No. 1, motion to appoint counsel, ECF No. 3, motion 19 for preliminary and permanent injunction, ECF No. 4, motion for expedited review and relief, 20 ECF No. 5, motion for judicial notice of court of appeal, ECF No. 7, motion for expedited 21 settlement conference, ECF No. 8, motion for judicial notice, ECF No. 10, and request for 22 criminal referral, ECF No. 11. 23 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by litigants who, as here, have 24 been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Under this 25 screening provision, the Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if it: (1) is frivolous or 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.