Macomber

Larry Sermeno v. Jeff Macomber, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20252:25-cv-02377California1,575 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARRY SERMENO, No. 2:25-CV-02377-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER JEFF MACOMBER, et al., And Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s original complaint, ECF No. 1, motion to appoint counsel, ECF No. 3, motion for preliminary and permanent injunction, ECF No. 4, motion for expedited review and relief, ECF No. 5, motion for judicial notice of court of appeal, ECF No. 7, motion for expedited settlement conference, ECF No. 8, motion for judicial notice, ECF No. 10, and request for criminal referral, ECF No. 11. The Court is required to screen complaints brought by litigants who, as here, have been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Under this screening provision, the Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if it: (1) is frivolous or 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.