Cherrish Castaneda v. 6939 Fair Oaks Blvd TIC LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20252:25-cv-02804California4,058 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHERRISH CASTANEDA, No. 2:25-cv-02804-TLN-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 6939 FAIR OAKS BLVD TIC LLC, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant 19 to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff filed her complaint on September 20 29, 2025, and has filed five motions. Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma 21 pauperis (“IFP”) and a declaration, including a statement of income and expenses, averring she is 22 unable to pay the costs of these proceedings. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The motion to proceed 23 IFP will therefore be granted. However, for the reasons provided below, the Court finds 24 Plaintiff’s complaint is legally deficient and will grant Plaintiff leave to file an amended 25 complaint. The Court herein addresses the remaining motions and recommends the motion for 26 temporary restraining order be denied.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.