Warden

Victor Molinero Puente v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20251:23-cv-00083California767 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VICTOR MOLINERO PUENTE, No. 1:23-cv-00083-CDB (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

13 v. DISMISSED FOR PETITIONER’S FAILURE

TO FILE AN OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT

14 WARDEN, OF NON-OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

15 Respondent. 14-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 18 Background 19 Petitioner Victor Molinero Puente (“Petitioner”), a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and 20 in forma pauperis, initiated this action by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 21 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 1). Following a preliminary review of the petition and finding that it is not 22 clear from the face of the petition whether Petitioner is entitled to relief, on June 23, 2025, the Court 23 ordered Respondent to file a response to Petitioner’s petition within 60 days of the date of service 24 of the order. (Doc. 10). The same order instructed Petitioner that his traverse to any answer or 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.