Pompeian, Inc. v. The Mill at Kings River, LLC, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20251:24-cv-00766California9,745 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 POMPEIAN, INC., Case No. 1:24-cv-00766-JLT-EPG 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING PART PLAINTIFF POMPEIAN,

13 THE MILL AT KINGS RIVER, LLC, et INC.’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS al., 14 (ECF No. 76) Defendants. 15

16 THE MILL AT KINGS RIVER, LLC, 17 Defendant, 18 v. 19 SUNRISE OLIVE RANCH, LLC, et al., 20 Cross-Defendant. 21 In this civil action, Pompeian, Inc. (“Plaintiff”), asserts claims for breach of contract, 22 breach of an implied in fact contract, quasi-contract, conversion and fraud against The Mill at 23 Kings River, LLC. and John Mesrobian (“Defendants”) (ECF No. 10.) Defendants also assert a 24 cross claim against Sunrise Olive Ranch, LLC. (“Cross-Defendant”) for breach of fiduciary duty, 25 fraud, and breach of joint venture/partnership agreement. 26 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions (ECF Nos. 76), asking that the Court 27 issue several orders as sanctions against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.