Charles
Quang Vinh Duong v. Marcos Charles
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9 QUANG VINH DUONG, Case No. 1:25-cv-01375-SKO (HC)
10 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDANT 11 TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL v. DECLARATION 12 13 MARCOS CHARLES,
14 Defendants. _____________________________________/ 15 16 The Court has reviewed Petitioner Quang Vinh Duong’s amended petition for writ of habeas 17 corpus, (Doc. 1); motion for temporary restraining order, (Doc. 2); opposition to the motion by 18 Respondents Marcos Charles, Moises Becerra, Kristi Noem, and Pamela Bondi, (Doc. 12); and 19 associated declaration by Deportation Officer Samuel Medina Jr, (Doc. 13 (“Medina Decl.”)); as 20 well as Petitioner’s reply, (Doc. 15). 21 In the course of the Court’s review of the papers, the Court has taken judicial notice of 22 Government’s filings in a similar case, Nguyen v Albarran, that is currently being adjudicated in 23 this District. No. 1:25-cv-01327-KES-SKO (HC); see Reyn’s Pasta Bella, LLC v. Visa USA, Inc., 24 442 F.3d 741, 746 n.6 (9th Cir. 2006)…