Charles

Quang Vinh Duong v. Marcos Charles

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20251:25-cv-01375California562 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

QUANG VINH DUONG, Case No. 1:25-cv-01375-SKO (HC)

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDANT TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL v. DECLARATION 12 MARCOS CHARLES,

Defendants. _____________________________________/ 15 The Court has reviewed Petitioner Quang Vinh Duong’s amended petition for writ of habeas corpus, (Doc. 1); motion for temporary restraining order, (Doc. 2); opposition to the motion by Respondents Marcos Charles, Moises Becerra, Kristi Noem, and Pamela Bondi, (Doc. 12); and associated declaration by Deportation Officer Samuel Medina Jr, (Doc. 13 (“Medina Decl.”)); as well as Petitioner’s reply, (Doc. 15). In the course of the Court’s review of the papers, the Court has taken judicial notice of Government’s filings in a similar case, Nguyen v Albarran, that is currently being adjudicated in this District. No. 1:25-cv-01327-KES-SKO (HC); see Reyn’s Pasta Bella, LLC v. Visa USA, Inc., 442 F.3d 741, 746 n.6 (9th Cir. 2006)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.