SaaHdi Abdul Coleman v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SAAHDI ABDUL COLEMAN, 12 Plaintiff, No. 2:21-cv-00625-TLN-EFB (PC) 13 v. 14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ORDER

CORRECTIONS AND

15 REHABILITATION, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff proceeds without counsel in this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. 19 § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 20 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On August 7 and September 18, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and 22 recommendations which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections 23 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF Nos. 97, 24 100.) These deadlines have passed, and no objections have been filed. 25 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 26 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 27 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147…