Bobby Lee Collins v. D. Smith, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20252:24-cv-01229California304 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BOBBY LEE COLLINS, Plaintiff, No. 2:24-cv-01229-TLN-SCR v. D. SMITH, et al., ORDER Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Bobby Lee Collins (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 22, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days. (ECF No. 13.) This deadline has passed, and no objections have been filed. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.