Eugene Price v. The People

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EUGENE PRICE,

12 Petitioner, No. 2:24-cv-03418-TLN-CKD

13 14 v. ORDER

THE PEOPLE,

15 Respondent. 16 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Eugene Price’s (“Petitioner”) “objections” to 19 the assigned magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations in this closed habeas action. (ECF 20 No. 15.) The Court construes this request as a motion to reconsider its prior order. For the 21 reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s motion. 22 Petitioner filed this habeas action on December 9, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) On February 3, 23 2025, the assigned magistrate judge made findings and recommendations to summarily dismiss 24 the petition because Petitioner was complaining about the representation of his then-current 25 counsel on direct appeal rather than asserting any grounds upon which the court could grant 26 habeas relief. (ECF No. 8 at 1–2.) The findings and recommendations contained notice that any 27 objections were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. …