Eugene Price v. The People

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20252:24-cv-03418California648 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EUGENE PRICE,

Petitioner, No. 2:24-cv-03418-TLN-CKD

13 v. ORDER

THE PEOPLE,

15 Respondent. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Eugene Price’s (“Petitioner”) “objections” to the assigned magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations in this closed habeas action. (ECF No. 15.) The Court construes this request as a motion to reconsider its prior order. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s motion. Petitioner filed this habeas action on December 9, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) On February 3, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge made findings and recommendations to summarily dismiss the petition because Petitioner was complaining about the representation of his then-current counsel on direct appeal rather than asserting any grounds upon which the court could grant habeas relief. (ECF No. 8 at 1–2.) The findings and recommendations contained notice that any objections were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.