Lundy

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL SOLANO, 12 Plaintiff, No. 2:25-cv-0797-TLN-JDP (P) 13 v. 14 LEANNA LUNDY, ORDER 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Daniel Solano (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil 18 rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On August 21, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were 21 served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 14.) 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007)…