Anton A. Iagounov v. AUSA, FBI, etc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20252:25-cv-01258California336 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTON A. IAGOUNOV, 12 Petitioner, No. 2:25-cv-1258-TLN-CSK 13 v. 14 AUSA, FBI, etc., ORDER 15 Respondents. 16 17 Petitioner Anton A. Iagounov (“Petitioner”), a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an 18 application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to 19 a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On July 11, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were 21 served on Petitioner and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 7.) On August 4, 2025, 23 the July 11, 2025, findings and recommendations were re-served on Petitioner. Petitioner did not 24 file objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 26 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.