Anton A. Iagounov v. AUSA, FBI, etc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20252:25-cv-01258California336 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTON A. IAGOUNOV, Petitioner, No. 2:25-cv-1258-TLN-CSK v. AUSA, FBI, etc., ORDER Respondents. 16 Petitioner Anton A. Iagounov (“Petitioner”), a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 11, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 7.) On August 4, 2025, the July 11, 2025, findings and recommendations were re-served on Petitioner. Petitioner did not file objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.