Miranda

Joseph G. Klotz v. T. Miranda, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20252:25-cv-01273California298 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

s 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH G. KLOTZ, No. 2:25-cv-1273-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND T. MIRANDA, et al., FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants.

17 By order filed on August 29, 2025 (ECF No. 6), plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The time granted for plaintiff to file an amended complaint has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, sought an extension of time to do so, or otherwise communicated with a court. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall assign a district judge to this case. In addition, IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.