Kenneth Hill v. Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KENNETH HILL, 12 Plaintiff, No. 2:25-cv-1542-TLN-SCR 13 v. 14 SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S ORDER

DEPARTMENT,

15 Defendant. 16

17 Plaintiff Kenneth Hill (“Plaintiff”), a county prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil 18 rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On September 10, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days. (ECF No. 11.) This deadline has 23 passed, and no objections have been filed. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 27 magistrate…