Caraway

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARVIN WHITTMAN, 12 Plaintiff, No. 2:25-cv-1426-TLN-DMC 13 v. 14 CORIE J. CARAWAY, et al., ORDER 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Marvin Whittman (“Plaintiff”), who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. 18 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of 19 California local rules. 20 On September 15, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 22 within the time specified therein. (ECF No. 11.) This deadline has passed and no objections have 23 been filed. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 27 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court…