Raghvendra Singh v. Robert St. Andre, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAGHVENDRA SINGH, Plaintiff, No. 2:25-cv-2036-TLN-CKD (PS) v. ROBERT ST. ANDRE, et al., ORDER Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Raghvendra Singh (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on July 22, 2025. (ECF No. 1.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On September 15, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which contained notice that any objections were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 4.) The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court[.]”). Having reviewed…