Unknown
Steven Oscar Austin v. Unknown
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEVEN OSCAR AUSTIN, No. 2:25-cv-2054 DAD CSK P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 UNKNOWN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a petition for writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the following reasons, the findings and 19 recommendations filed October 9, 2025 are vacated. 20 By an order filed August 27, 2025, petitioner was ordered to file a habeas corpus petition 21 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his Stanislaus County conviction and in forma pauperis 22 affidavit, or to pay the appropriate filing fee, within thirty days. (ECF No. 8.) Thirty days passed 23 and petitioner did not file a habeas corpus petition or an in forma pauperis affidavit, and did not 24 pay the filing fee. Accordingly, on October 9, 2025, this Court recommended that this action be 25 dismissed. (ECF No. 10.) 26 On October 14, 2025, petitioner filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 27 …