Clendenin
Patrick Neill v. Stephanie Clendenin, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PATRICK NEILL, No. 1:23-cv-00910-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE
13 v. TO THIS ACTION 14 STEPHANIE CLENDENIN, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
15 Defendants. DISMISS 16 (ECF No. 14) 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss, filed April 26, 2024. 21 . 22 I. 23 BACKGROUND 24 Plaintiff, a civil detainee, is proceeding on his Fourteenth Amendment claims that: (1) he 25 was not provided mental health treatment; and (2) he was subjected to disparate treatment that 26 amount to improper punishment. 27 /// 28 1 Defendants filed the instant motion to dismiss on April…