Ortiz
Azucena Ortiz, et al. v. Lucero Ag Services, Inc., et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 AZUCENA ORTIZ, et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-01319-JLT-EPG 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF THESE
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
11 v.
FINDING AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
12 LUCERO AG SERVICES, INC., et al., (1) GRANT PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
SANCTIONS, IN PART; (2) STRIKE
13 Defendants. ANSWER OF DEFENDANT RICARDO
ULICES LUCERO-AMBROSIO; (3) ENTER
14 DEFAULT AGAINST THIS DEFENDANT; (4) GRANT PLAINTIFFS PERMISSION TO 15 MOVE FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
AGAINST THIS DEFENDANT; AND (5)
16 AWARD PLAINTIFFS $1,597.50 IN
ATTORNEY’S FEES
17
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN 14
18 DAYS 19 20 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion requesting sanctions because of 21 Defendant Ricardo Ulices Lucero-Ambrosio’s (also referred to as Defendant Lucero) failure to 22 comply with the Court’s June 23, 2025 order requiring him to produce discovery. (ECF No. 89,…