Perez

Alejandro Andres Perez, et al. v. County of Kern, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20251:25-cv-00358California3,911 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3

4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 ALEJANDRO ANDRES PEREZ, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-00358-KES-CDB

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE PARTIES’ REQUEST FOR

RESOLUTION OF DISCOVERY DISPUTES

13 v. (Doc. 46) 14 COUNTY OF KERN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 Pending before the Court is a discovery dispute that the parties have agreed to submit to the 18 Court for adjudication through the Court’s informal discovery dispute procedure. (Docs. 44-47). 19 Following their submission of a joint discovery dispute letter brief (Doc. 46), on October 23, 2025, the 20 Court convened with counsel for Plaintiffs (Robert Ross Powell) and counsel for Defendant County of 21 Kern and individual County defendants (Andrew Christopher Hamilton) via Zoom for informal 22 discovery dispute conference. (Doc. 47). Defendant Margaret Eichorst at the time had not appeared 23 in the action and was not present at the conference. Because no party objected to proceeding with 24 informal discovery dispute resolution and no party requested to brief a motion to compel, the Court 25 heard argument…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.