Prince Paul Raymond Williams v. Capital One, N.A., et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, No. 1:25-cv-00980-KES-EPG 11 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER 12 v. ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO: 13 CAPITAL ONE, N.A., et al., (1) FILE A SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT; OR
14 Defendants. (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE 15 WISHES TO STAND ON HIS
COMPLAINT
16 (ECF NO. 13) 17
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
18 19 Plaintiff Prince Paul Raymond Williams (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma 20 pauperis. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on August 7, 2025. (ECF No. 1). 21 Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on September 18, 2025. (ECF No. 13). Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is 110 pages long. It asserts 14 causes of action 22 against eight defendants. Plaintiff appears to assert that Defendants improperly sold or assigned 23 an indebted account attributed to Plaintiff and published that account for collections. 24 The Court finds that the First Amended Complaint fails to state any cognizable…