Cherrish Castaneda v. State of California Department of Motor Vehicles, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHERRISH CASTANEDA, No. 2:24-cv-0788-DC-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES,
et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), which was granted. ECF No. 6 at 13. The undersigned issued a screening order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and concluded that Plaintiff’s complaint was legally deficient. Id. The District Judge subsequently dismissed with prejudice all claims against Defendant Department of Motor Vehicles (“DMV”), as well as claims brought under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241-242 as against all Defendants. ECF No. 7 at 2-3. However, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend claims brought under § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) as against Defendant Steve Gordon in his…