Rodriguez

Maurice L. Venable v. Rodriguez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20252:24-cv-02869California1,792 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MAURICE L. VENABLE, No. 2:24-cv-2869 AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 RODRIGUEZ, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state inmate who filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 18 without a lawyer. He has requested leave to proceed without paying the full filing fee for this 19 action, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 2. Plaintiff has submitted a declaration showing that he 20 cannot afford to pay the entire filing fee. See ECF Nos. 2, 4; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). 21 Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.1 22 //// 23 //// 24 1 This means that plaintiff is allowed to pay the $350.00 filing fee in monthly installments that 25 are taken from the inmate’s trust account rather than in one lump sum. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 26 1915(b)(1). As part of this order, the prison is required to remove an initial partial filing fee from plaintiff’s trust account. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). A separate order directed to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.