Dolores Lucero v. Oak Run Elementary School District, et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DOLORES LUCERO, No. 2:24-cv-02854-DC-SCR 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 13 OAK RUN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant 17 to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636. On September 18, 2025, District Judge Coggins 18 entered an Order (ECF No. 90) adopting the Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 71), and 19 granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss. The Order dismissed the School Board Defendants 20 without leave to amend claims against those defendants. The Order also granted Defendant 21 Livingston’s motion to dismiss, with leave to amend “only as to the retaliation and class-of-one 22 claims” against Defendant Livingston. ECF No. 90 at 2. The Order granted Plaintiff 30 days to 23 file an amended complaint. Because the Court served the Order by mail, an amended complaint 24 was due by October 23, 2025.1 Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.…