Basilio Trevon Sims v. Sacramento County, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20252:25-cv-02849California2,413 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BASILIO TREVON SIMS, No. 2:25-cv-2849 SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is incarcerated in state prison and proceeds pro se with this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) is before the undersigned for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. (ECF No. 5.) For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned finds that plaintiff’s FAC fails to state any cognizable claims for relief. Plaintiff will be given leave to file an amended complaint. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed without paying the full filing fee for this action, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff has submitted a declaration showing that he cannot afford to pay the entire filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This means that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.