Raymond A. Treon v. Warden, FCI-Mendota

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAYMOND A. TREON, Case No. 1:25-cv-00122-HBK (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S

MOTION FOR A STAY OF BRIEFING IN

13 v. LIGHT OF LAPSE OF APPROPRIATIONS

14 WARDEN, FCI-MENDOTA, (Doc. No. 26)

15 Respondent.

16 17 18 Pending before the Court is Respondent’s motion for a stay of briefing in light of the lapse 19 of appropriations to the Department of Justice at the end of the day on September 30, 2025, which 20 also affected the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”). (Doc. No. 26). Respondent requests a stay of 21 briefing until Congress has restored appropriations to provide the information necessary to 22 effectively respond to Petitioner Raymond Treon’s Second Amended Petition (Doc. No. 21). 23 (Id.).1 24 The court is vested with broad discretion to stay a case. Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 25 705 (1997) (citing Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936)). As a rule, “stays 26 should not be indefinite in…