Chestnut
Julio F. V. v. Christopher Chestnut, Warden of California City Detention Facility, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JULIO F. V., Case No.: 1:25-cv-01432-KES-SKO (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S
REQUEST TO PROCEED UNDER
13 v. PSEUDONYM AND FOR PROTECTIVE
ORDER
14 CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT, Warden of California City Detention Facility, et al., [Doc. 2] 15 Respondents. 16
17 18 Petitioner is an immigration detainee proceeding with counsel with a petition for writ of 19 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s October 27, 20 2025, motion to proceed under pseudonym and for protective order. (Doc. 2.) 21 The Ninth Circuit has held that “a party may preserve his or her anonymity in judicial 22 proceedings in special circumstances when the party's need for anonymity outweighs prejudice to 23 the opposing party and the public's interest in knowing the party's identity.” Does I thru XXIII v. 24 Advanced Textile Corp., 214 F.3d 1058, 1068 (9th Cir. 2000). In determining the need for 25 anonymity, the Court must…