Wilburn

William M. Tezak v. Robert Wilburn, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20252:22-cv-02219California949 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM M. TEZAK, No. 2:22-CV-02219-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROBERT WILBURN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s motion for 60-day extension of time and motion for reconsideration. See ECF Nos. 12 and 13. 20 As a preliminary matter, the undersigned will grant Plaintiff’s motion for a 60-day extension of time to file a third amended complaint. As to Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, given the Court provided Plaintiff leave to amend, the Court has already provided the relief Plaintiff seeks. Therefore, the undersigned will deny Plaintiff’s motion. In the motion for reconsideration, Plaintiff raises a number of issues largely related to the claims this Court found to be incurable in ECF No. 11. See ECF No. 13. Plaintiff asserts that the Court improperly dismissed Claims One, Two, Three, Four,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.