M.B.

M.B. v. COUNTY OF BUTTE, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20252:23-cv-01977California3,457 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 M.B., No. 2:23-cv-01977-DAD-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT

COUNTY OF BUTTE, et al., AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 52, 77)

17 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s May 8, 2025 motion for leave to amend the complaint and plaintiff’s September 16, 2025 motion to modify the scheduling order. (Doc. Nos. 52, 77.) The motions were taken under submission on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. Nos. 57, 81.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend the complaint and deny plaintiff’s motion to modify the scheduling order. BACKGROUND On September 13, 2023, plaintiff M.B. filed the complaint initiating this action against defendants County of Butte, Stephanie Brazil, Sarah Cornett, Panuke, Michael…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.