M.B.
M.B. v. COUNTY OF BUTTE, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 M.B., No. 2:23-cv-01977-DAD-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT
14 COUNTY OF BUTTE, et al., AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER
15 Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 52, 77) 16
17 18 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s May 8, 2025 motion for leave to amend the 19 complaint and plaintiff’s September 16, 2025 motion to modify the scheduling order. (Doc. Nos. 20 52, 77.) The motions were taken under submission on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). 21 (Doc. Nos. 57, 81.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant plaintiff’s motion for 22 leave to amend the complaint and deny plaintiff’s motion to modify the scheduling order. 23 BACKGROUND 24 On September 13, 2023, plaintiff M.B. filed the complaint initiating this action against 25 defendants County of Butte, Stephanie Brazil, Sarah Cornett, Panuke, Michael…