Eric Anthony Armstrong v. County of Plumas, et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ERIC ANTHONY ARMSTRONG, No. 2:25-cv-00904 DC SCR P 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 COUNTY OF PLUMAS, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff, who is incarcerated in county jail, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 17 with this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 28, 2025, the undersigned 18 screened plaintiff’s complaint and found it failed to state any cognizable claims for relief. (ECF 19 No. 8.) Plaintiff was granted thirty (30) days to file an amended complaint. (Id. at 13.) Plaintiff 20 was further advised that failure to file an amended complaint would result in the recommendation 21 that the action be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Id. 22 at 14.) 23 The time for plaintiff to amend his complaint has now passed, and plaintiff has not filed 24 an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the screening order. Accordingly, the 25 undersigned recommends that the action…